[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+wJz6qnX1Tsb9BTsbd4zjDXr61DLRmmNwDZ2+F6CwpQ1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:51:52 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/20] kasan: add and integrate kasan boot parameters
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 7:29 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
>
> This should include <linux/static_key.h> -- although the rest of the
> kernel seems to also inconsistently use on or the other. Since the name,
> as referred to also by macros are "static keys", perhaps the
> static_key.h header is more appropriate...
Will fix.
> > +enum kasan_arg_stacktrace {
> > + KASAN_ARG_STACKTRACE_DEFAULT,
>
> It seems KASAN_ARG_STACKTRACE_DEFAULT is never used explicitly. Could
> the switch statements just be changed to not have a 'default' but
> instead refer to *DEFAULT where appropriate?
We need to either cover all cases explicitly, or use default in each
switch, otherwise there's a warning. I guess covering everything
explicitly is a better approach, in case more values are added in the
future, as we'll get warnings for those if they aren't covered in
switches. Will do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists