linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201112221543.3621014-21-guro@fb.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:15:29 -0800
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 16 +---------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
index 563f96cc8a9d..7103d89a7d41 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
@@ -84,8 +84,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *cpu_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	u32 value_size = attr->value_size;
 	struct bpf_cpu_map *cmap;
 	int err = -ENOMEM;
-	u64 cost;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (!bpf_capable())
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
@@ -109,26 +107,14 @@ static struct bpf_map *cpu_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		goto free_cmap;
 	}
 
-	/* make sure page count doesn't overflow */
-	cost = (u64) cmap->map.max_entries * sizeof(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *);
-
-	/* Notice returns -EPERM on if map size is larger than memlock limit */
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&cmap->map.memory, cost);
-	if (ret) {
-		err = ret;
-		goto free_cmap;
-	}
-
 	/* Alloc array for possible remote "destination" CPUs */
 	cmap->cpu_map = bpf_map_area_alloc(cmap->map.max_entries *
 					   sizeof(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *),
 					   cmap->map.numa_node);
 	if (!cmap->cpu_map)
-		goto free_charge;
+		goto free_cmap;
 
 	return &cmap->map;
-free_charge:
-	bpf_map_charge_finish(&cmap->map.memory);
 free_cmap:
 	kfree(cmap);
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
-- 
2.26.2