| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1605148938.26323.127.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:42:18 +0800
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
CC: <youlin.pei@...iatek.com>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...gle.com>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
<chao.hao@...iatek.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<kernel-team@...roid.com>, <anan.sun@...iatek.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/24] iommu/mediatek: Add device link for smi-common
and m4u
On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 09:10 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:40 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > In the lastest SoC, M4U has its special power domain. thus, If the engine
> > begin to work, it should help enable the power for M4U firstly.
> > Currently if the engine work, it always enable the power/clocks for
> > smi-larbs/smi-common. This patch adds device_link for smi-common and M4U.
> > then, if smi-common power is enabled, the M4U power also is powered on
> > automatically.
> >
> > Normally M4U connect with several smi-larbs and their smi-common always
> > are the same, In this patch it get smi-common dev from the first smi-larb
> > device(i==0), then add the device_link only while m4u has power-domain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index cfdf5ce696fd..4ce7e0883e4d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > @@ -705,7 +706,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return larb_nr;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < larb_nr; i++) {
> > - struct device_node *larbnode;
> > + struct device_node *larbnode, *smicomm_node;
> > struct platform_device *plarbdev;
> > u32 id;
> >
> > @@ -731,6 +732,26 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > component_match_add_release(dev, &match, release_of,
> > compare_of, larbnode);
> > + if (!i) {
>
> Maybe more of a style preference, but since you are actually comparing
> an integer, I prefer seeing i == 0.
>
> Also, might be nicer to do
>
> if (i != 0)
> continue;
>
> And de-indent the rest.
Thanks. will fix.
>
> > + smicomm_node = of_parse_phandle(larbnode, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> > + if (!smicomm_node)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + plarbdev = of_find_device_by_node(smicomm_node);
> > + of_node_put(smicomm_node);
> > + data->smicomm_dev = &plarbdev->dev;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (dev->pm_domain) {
> > + struct device_link *link;
> > +
> > + link = device_link_add(data->smicomm_dev, dev,
> > + DL_FLAG_STATELESS | DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME);
> > + if (!link) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Unable link %s.\n", dev_name(data->smicomm_dev));
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> > @@ -738,14 +759,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > ret = iommu_device_sysfs_add(&data->iommu, dev, NULL,
> > "mtk-iommu.%pa", &ioaddr);
> > if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out_link_remove;
> >
> > iommu_device_set_ops(&data->iommu, &mtk_iommu_ops);
> > iommu_device_set_fwnode(&data->iommu, &pdev->dev.of_node->fwnode);
> >
> > ret = iommu_device_register(&data->iommu);
> > if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out_sysfs_remove;
>
> Technically, this change is unrelated.
Sharp eye. Right. I thought it was small enough to squash here.
I will use a new patch to fix this(add fixes tag, and no need add
cc-stable I think.).
>
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&data->tlb_lock);
> > list_add_tail(&data->list, &m4ulist);
> > @@ -754,6 +775,13 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &mtk_iommu_ops);
> >
> > return component_master_add_with_match(dev, &mtk_iommu_com_ops, match);
> > +
> > +out_sysfs_remove:
> > + iommu_device_sysfs_remove(&data->iommu);
> > +out_link_remove:
> > + if (dev->pm_domain)
> > + device_link_remove(data->smicomm_dev, dev);
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int mtk_iommu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -767,6 +795,8 @@ static int mtk_iommu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, NULL);
> >
> > clk_disable_unprepare(data->bclk);
> > + if (pdev->dev.pm_domain)
> > + device_link_remove(data->smicomm_dev, &pdev->dev);
> > devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, data->irq, data);
> > component_master_del(&pdev->dev, &mtk_iommu_com_ops);
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > index d0c93652bdbe..5e03a029c4dc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct mtk_iommu_data {
> >
> > struct iommu_device iommu;
> > const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data *plat_data;
> > + struct device *smicomm_dev;
> >
> > struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping; /* For mtk_iommu_v1.c */
> >
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists