[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201112095422.in6s5ctgv7in35on@gilmour.lan>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:54:22 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, wens@...e.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiny.windzz@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: fix sid node name
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:21:01PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote:
> From: Yangtao Li <frank@...winnertech.com>
>
> Sid should be an efuse type device accurately. And no one
> needs sid label, so delete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank@...winnertech.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> index dc238814013c..96543df5d890 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ mmc2: mmc@...1000 {
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> - sid: eeprom@...4000 {
> + efuse@...4000 {
> compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid";
> reg = <0x1c14000 0x400>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
I agree with this on principle, but we should do it on all the SoCs at
once. Can you send another version doing so?
Thanks!
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists