[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0063409a-317f-56c0-6123-b23804ab45d9@metafoo.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:52:42 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: ad_sigma_delta: Don't put SPI transfer buffer on the
stack
On 11/12/20 11:14 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:55 AM Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> wrote:
>> On 11/12/20 10:10 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
>>> From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
>>>
>>> Use a heap allocated memory for the SPI transfer buffer. Using stack memory
>>> can corrupt stack memory when using DMA on some systems.
>>>
>>> This change adds 4 bytes at the end of the current DMA buffer, which will
>>> be used by the trigger handler.
>>> This is required because the first 4 bytes are reserved for register data.
>>>
>>> Fixes: af3008485ea03 ("iio:adc: Add common code for ADI Sigma Delta devices")
>>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c | 4 ++--
>>> include/linux/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.h | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
>>> index 86039e9ecaca..33297f26508a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
>>> @@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ static irqreturn_t ad_sd_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>>> struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
>>> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
>>> struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta = iio_device_get_drvdata(indio_dev);
>>> + uint8_t *data = &sigma_delta->data[4];
>>> unsigned int reg_size;
>>> unsigned int data_reg;
>>> - uint8_t data[16];
>>>
>>> - memset(data, 0x00, 16);
>>> + memset(data, 0x00, 4);
>> Younger me didn't know what he was doing, this is wrong. We need the
>> extra space for the padding and timestamp.
>>
>> We also can't put the beginning of the buffer at an 4 byte offset since
>> it needs to be 8 byte aligned for the timestamp.
> I'll correct this.
> I was re-spinning this out of some old patches and discussions on this
> that I have.
> So, then this becomes 24 bytes? Or 16?
>
> Something like:
> uint8_t data[24] ____cacheline_aligned;
>
> uint8_t *data = &sigma_delta->data[8];
Yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists