linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] x86/hyperv: detect if Linux is the root partition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201112114641.fstyteqqsic7h6xh@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:46:41 +0000
From:   Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Linux on Hyper-V List <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
        Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] x86/hyperv: detect if Linux is the root
 partition

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:42:15AM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:16:07AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Wei,
> > 
> > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> > 
> > [auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
> > [also build test ERROR on asm-generic/master iommu/next tip/timers/core pci/next linus/master v5.10-rc2 next-20201105]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> > 
> 
> This report is incorrect.
> 
> The bot seems to have only picked up this one patch but not the whole
> series. While the patch can apply cleanly to all those trees, it has a
> dependency on an earlier patch in this series.

I misread this report and I'm confused now. Let me fetch the config and
try locally first.

Wei.