[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtB0tYwVKdV47fL_zZ_AqTcfk9ZXg3i7RCTJZ-hczjvMSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:17:18 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...rret.net>,
"open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Rick Yiu <rickyiu@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix overutilized update in enqueue_task_fair()
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 12:12, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> enqueue_task_fair() attempts to skip the overutilized update for new
> tasks as their util_avg is not accurate yet. However, the flag we check
> to do so is overwritten earlier on in the function, which makes the
> condition pretty much a nop.
>
> Fix this by saving the flag early on.
>
> Fixes: 2802bf3cd936 ("sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point
> indicator")
> Reported-by: Rick Yiu <rickyiu@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 290f9e38378c..f3ee60b92718 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5477,6 +5477,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> int idle_h_nr_running = task_has_idle_policy(p);
> + int task_new = !(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
>
> /*
> * The code below (indirectly) updates schedutil which looks at
> @@ -5549,7 +5550,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> * into account, but that is not straightforward to implement,
> * and the following generally works well enough in practice.
> */
> - if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
> + if (!task_new)
> update_overutilized_status(rq);
>
> enqueue_throttle:
> --
> 2.29.2.222.g5d2a92d10f8-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists