linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/25] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Remove set but unchecked variable 'ret'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ca303b27-b5a6-0d8e-2577-e6dbd8363382@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:33:25 +0200
From:   Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        <tomi.valkeinen@...com>, <kishon@...com>, <dmurphy@...com>,
        <s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/25] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Remove set but unchecked
 variable 'ret'

On 12/11/2020 15:21, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Tero Kristo wrote:
> 
>> On 12/11/2020 12:31, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Cc:ing a few people I know.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function ‘knav_setup_queue_pools’:
>>>>    drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1310:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Sandeep Nair <sandeep_n@...com>
>>>> Cc: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@...com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 3 +--
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Any idea who will take these TI patches?
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201111052540.GH173948@builder.lan/
>>>
>>
>> (Dropped a few inactive emails from delivery.)
>>
>> Santosh is the maintainer for the subsystem, so my vote would go for him.
> 
> Thanks for your prompt reply Tero.
> 
> It looks as though Santosh has been on Cc since the start.  He must
> just be busy.  I'll give him a little while longer before submitting a
> [RESEND].

Yeah, in my experience it can take a while for Santosh to react on 
patches. :)

-Tero


--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki