linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: google: dt-bindings: add new compatible for sc7180-coachz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:36:37 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     xuyuqing <xuyuqing@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, tzungbi@...omium.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, dgreid@...omium.org,
        cychiang@...omium.org, Rohit kumar <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        judyhsiao@...omium.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zhouguohui@...qin.corp-partner.google.com, dianders@...omium.org,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: google: dt-bindings: add new compatible for
 sc7180-coachz

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:43:27 +0800, xuyuqing wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings for coachz in documentation file
> 
> Signed-off-by: xuyuqing <xuyuqing@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/sound/google,sc7180-trogdor.yaml      | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.