lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3268301-6cbd-904e-949c-7ccc4a2e5d36@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:36:02 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, wei.huang2@....com, mlevitsk@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: SVM: Use a separate vmcb for the nested L2
 guest

On 13/10/20 03:33, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> +	svm->vmcb = svm->vmcb01;
>> +	svm->vmcb_pa = svm->vmcb01_pa;
> I very highly recommend adding a helper to switch VMCB.  Odds are very good
> there will be more than just these two lines of boilerplate code for changing
> the active VMCB.

Yes, probably we can make svm->vmcb01 and svm->vmcb02 something like 
VMX's struct loaded_vmcs:

struct kvm_vmcb {
	void *vmcb;
	unsigned long pa;
}

I don't expect a lot more to happen due to SVM having no need for 
caching, so for now I think it's okay.

I have other comments for which I'll reply to the patch itself.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ