[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c446d3f19dd644eb520ae29a4d0b91a7ea3b956.camel@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:28:51 +0100
From: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
yhs@...com, andrii@...nel.org, kpsingh@...omium.org,
jackmanb@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Expose bpf_sk_storage_* to iterator programs
On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 13:57 -0800, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> Test(s) is needed. e.g. iterating a bpf_sk_storage_map and also
> calling bpf_sk_storage_get/delete.
>
> I would expect to see another test/example showing how it works end-
> to-end to solve the problem you have in hand.
> This patch probably belongs to a longer series.
Fair point, I'll get that done, thank you!
> BTW, I am also enabling bpf_sk_storage_(get|delete) for
> FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP but I think the conflict should be manageable.
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20201112211313.2587383-1-kafai@fb.com/
Thanks for the heads up, should be no problem :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists