linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bpf: Expose bpf_sk_storage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:28:51 +0100
From:   Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
To:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        yhs@...com, andrii@...nel.org, kpsingh@...omium.org,
        jackmanb@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Expose bpf_sk_storage_* to iterator programs

On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 13:57 -0800, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> Test(s) is needed.  e.g. iterating a bpf_sk_storage_map and also
> calling bpf_sk_storage_get/delete.
> 
> I would expect to see another test/example showing how it works end-
> to-end to solve the problem you have in hand.
> This patch probably belongs to a longer series.

Fair point, I'll get that done, thank you!

> BTW, I am also enabling bpf_sk_storage_(get|delete) for
> FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP but I think the conflict should be manageable.
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20201112211313.2587383-1-kafai@fb.com/

Thanks for the heads up, should be no problem :)