[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201113191804.GH894261@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:18:04 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Sam Xi <xyzsam@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Use proper cpu for shadow stats
> CPU0 109,621,384 cycles
> CPU1 159,026,454 cycles
> CPU2 99,460,366 cycles
> CPU3 124,144,142 cycles
> CPU0 44,396,706 instructions # 0.41 insn per cycle
> CPU1 120,195,425 instructions # 0.76 insn per cycle
> CPU2 44,763,978 instructions # 0.45 insn per cycle
> CPU3 69,049,079 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
>
> 1.001910444 seconds time elapsed
Yes makes a lot of sense. Thanks for tracking that down.
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists