[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201113025311.jpkplhmacjz6lkc5@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 04:53:11 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>,
Paul Barker <pbarker@...sulko.com>,
Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: add
Pulse Per Second (PPS) support
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> static int ksz9477_ptp_enable(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct ptp_clock_request *req, int on)
> {
> - return -ENOTTY;
> + struct ksz_device *dev = container_of(ptp, struct ksz_device, ptp_caps);
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (req->type) {
> + case PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS:
> + mutex_lock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
> + ret = ksz9477_ptp_enable_pps(dev, on);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
> + return ret;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
Richard, do you think we can clarify the intended usage of PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS
in the documentation? It doesn't appear to be written anywhere that
PTP_ENABLE_PPS is supposed to enable event generation for the drivers/pps
subsystem. You would sort of have to know before you could find out...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists