[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63870297-fffe-f01e-9747-219b63c5d7f4@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:18:21 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Expose bpf_d_path helper to sleepable
LSM hooks
On 11/12/20 9:19 AM, KP Singh wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
>
> Sleepable hooks are never called from an NMI/interrupt context, so it is
> safe to use the bpf_d_path helper in LSM programs attaching to these
> hooks.
>
> The helper is not restricted to sleepable programs and merely uses the
> list of sleeable hooks as the initial subset of LSM hooks where it can
sleeable => sleepable
probably not need to resend if no other major changes. The maintainer
can just fix it up before merging.
> be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists