[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB263258BCE554A9EFD2F3A8A7FFE60@BYAPR11MB2632.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:59:37 +0000
From: "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
Subject: 回复: [PATCH] kthread_worker: Add flush delayed work func
________________________________________
发件人: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
发送时间: 2020年11月13日 8:01
收件人: Zhang, Qiang
抄送: pmladek@...e.com; tj@...nel.org; linux-mm@...ck.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
主题: Re: [PATCH] kthread_worker: Add flush delayed work func
[Please note this e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:13:55 +0800 qiang.zhang@...driver.com wrote:
> Add 'kthread_flush_delayed_work' func, the principle of
> this func is wait for a dwork to finish executing the
> last queueing.
>
>We'd like to see some code which actually uses this new function
>please. Either in this patch or as one or more followup patches.
>
>btw, we call it "function", not "func". But neither is really needed -
>just use () to identify a function. ie:
>: Add kthread_flush_delayed_work(). The principle of this is to wait for
>: a dwork to finish executing the last queueing.
I don't see it being used in the kernel code so far, and I'm not sure if it's going to be used in subsequent scenarios (it like flush_delayed_work in workqueue )or whether it's currently using "kthread_work" some code needs it.
Thanks
Qiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists