linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/25] arch: arm: mach-at91: pm: Move prototypes to mutually included header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201113100040.GA3718728@dell>
Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:00:40 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/25] arch: arm: mach-at91: pm: Move prototypes to
 mutually included header

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

> On 12/11/2020 10:48:10+0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 12/11/2020 09:39:18+0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Both the caller and the supplier's source file should have access to
> > > > the include file containing the prototypes.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c:1637:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘at91_pinctrl_gpio_suspend’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > > >  1637 | void at91_pinctrl_gpio_suspend(void)
> > > >  | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c:1661:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘at91_pinctrl_gpio_resume’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > > >  1661 | void at91_pinctrl_gpio_resume(void)
> > > >  | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > > > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> > > > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> > > > Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > > ---
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/soc/at91/pm.h b/include/soc/at91/pm.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..0fd5093f7f73a
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/include/soc/at91/pm.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * atmel platform data
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_AT91
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't that be a header guard instead of depending on PINCTRL_AT91 ?
> > 
> > I copied the same semantics from the header it was taken from.
> > 
> > Happy to turn it into a proper header file too.
> 
> I guess that would be better. How do you expect this patch to be merged?

I'll fix it.

No expectations.  Whatever's easiest.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog