linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: clflushopt should be treated as a no-op by emulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72b96832-634a-56f0-95aa-f9a282d8fbf8@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:26:20 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     David Edmondson <david.edmondson@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>, x86@...nel.org,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: clflushopt should be treated as a no-op by
 emulation

On 03/11/20 13:04, David Edmondson wrote:
> The instruction emulator ignores clflush instructions, yet fails to
> support clflushopt. Treat both similarly.
> 
> Fixes: 13e457e0eebf ("KVM: x86: Emulator does not decode clflush well")
> Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@...cle.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 8 +++++++-
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 0d917eb70319..56cae1ff9e3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -4046,6 +4046,12 @@ static int em_clflush(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   	return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>   }
>   
> +static int em_clflushopt(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> +{
> +	/* emulating clflushopt regardless of cpuid */
> +	return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> +}
> +
>   static int em_movsxd(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   {
>   	ctxt->dst.val = (s32) ctxt->src.val;
> @@ -4585,7 +4591,7 @@ static const struct opcode group11[] = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_ae_7 = {
> -	I(SrcMem | ByteOp, em_clflush), N, N, N,
> +	I(SrcMem | ByteOp, em_clflush), I(SrcMem | ByteOp, em_clflushopt), N, N,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct group_dual group15 = { {
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo