[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0c905c5-d118-2b74-1b76-fcb086a7faf4@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:05:28 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 1/2] arm-smmu-qcom: Ensure the qcom_scm driver has
finished probing
On 2020-11-12 22:05, John Stultz wrote:
> Robin Murphy pointed out that if the arm-smmu driver probes before
> the qcom_scm driver, we may call qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle()
> before the __scm is initialized.
>
> Now, getting this to happen is a bit contrived, as in my efforts it
> required enabling asynchronous probing for both drivers, moving the
> firmware dts node to the end of the dtsi file, as well as forcing a
> long delay in the qcom_scm_probe function.
>
> With those tweaks we ran into the following crash:
> [ 2.631040] arm-smmu 15000000.iommu: Stage-1: 48-bit VA -> 48-bit IPA
> [ 2.633372] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
> ...
> [ 2.633402] [0000000000000000] user address but active_mm is swapper
> [ 2.633409] Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 2.633415] Modules linked in:
> [ 2.633427] CPU: 5 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc1-mainline-00025-g272a618fc36-dirty #3971
> [ 2.633430] Hardware name: Thundercomm Dragonboard 845c (DT)
> [ 2.633448] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> [ 2.633456] pstate: 80c00005 (Nzcv daif +PAN +UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> [ 2.633465] pc : qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle+0x78/0xb0
> [ 2.633473] lr : qcom_smmu500_reset+0x58/0x78
> [ 2.633476] sp : ffffffc0105a3b60
> ...
> [ 2.633567] Call trace:
> [ 2.633572] qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle+0x78/0xb0
> [ 2.633576] qcom_smmu500_reset+0x58/0x78
> [ 2.633581] arm_smmu_device_reset+0x194/0x270
> [ 2.633585] arm_smmu_device_probe+0xc94/0xeb8
> [ 2.633592] platform_drv_probe+0x58/0xa8
> [ 2.633597] really_probe+0xec/0x398
> [ 2.633601] driver_probe_device+0x5c/0xb8
> [ 2.633606] __driver_attach_async_helper+0x64/0x88
> [ 2.633610] async_run_entry_fn+0x4c/0x118
> [ 2.633617] process_one_work+0x20c/0x4b0
> [ 2.633621] worker_thread+0x48/0x460
> [ 2.633628] kthread+0x14c/0x158
> [ 2.633634] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> [ 2.633642] Code: a9034fa0 d0007f73 29107fa0 91342273 (f9400020)
>
> To avoid this, this patch adds a check on qcom_scm_is_available() in
> the qcom_smmu_impl_init() function, returning -EPROBE_DEFER if its
> not ready.
>
> This allows the driver to try to probe again later after qcom_scm has
> finished probing.
As well as strict correctness, the other motivation here was that
qcom_scm_is_available() should be the place to add the "is the module
even loaded yet?" dance to iron out the awkward config dependencies in
future.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
> Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 66ba4870659f4..ef37ccfa82562 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu;
>
> + /* Check to make sure qcom_scm has finished probing */
> + if (!qcom_scm_is_available())
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> +
> qsmmu = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(*qsmmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!qsmmu)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists