linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f5ff9c2e-b341-8ae5-693f-bd71d4801995@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:13:58 -0800
From:   santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc:     Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Yuti Amonkar <yamonkar@...ence.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        Swapnil Jakhade <sjakhade@...ence.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs

On 11/12/20 2:22 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 13:59-20201112, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com wrote:
>> On 11/12/20 1:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 14:08-20201026, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>> On 23:30-20201026, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>> [..]
>>>>> ➜  linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC
>>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:961:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC=y
>>>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:7:config ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC
>>>>> ➜  linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC
>>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:962:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC=y
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/Kconfig:16:  depends on ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC ||
>>>>> COMPILE_TEST
>>>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:12:config ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I see drm bridge Kconfig is cleaned[0]. Please clean the defconfig as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> [0]
>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the defconfig patches have to be queued up in a different queue,
>>>> Lets see where the two patches fall and will post the defconfig
>>>> updates as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Santosh,
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$
>>> looks available in next now.
>>>
>>> Can we queue this patch[1] up for 5.11 window?
>>>
>>> Depending on your preference, I can carry the defconfig patch[2] (to
>>> prevent merge dependencies, might be good to get an immutable tag) OR
>>> you can pick the defconfig patch up that cleans after removing the
>>> symbol.
>>>
>>
>> I can apply SOC kconfig patch [1] to my soc branch. That branch with
>> some additional patches am going to send up, so it should
>> work. Let me know.
> 
> OK, sounds fine to me, If you can give me a tag, I can add queue up
> defconfig on top to prevent bisect issues.
> 
I won't be adding tag till all the commits are lineup but branch will
be immutable.

Regards.
Santosh