[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201113141734.660734753@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:02:24 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: [patch 17/19] softirq: Replace barrier() with cpu_relax() in
tasklet_unlock_wait()
A barrier() in a tight loop which waits for something to happen on a remote
CPU is a pointless exercise. Replace it with cpu_relax() which allows HT
siblings to make progress.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -668,7 +668,8 @@ static inline void tasklet_unlock(struct
static inline void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state)) { barrier(); }
+ while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state))
+ cpu_relax();
}
#else
#define tasklet_trylock(t) 1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists