[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201113014622.GA2942851@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:46:22 -0800
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: memcg/slab: pre-allocate obj_cgroups for slab
caches with SLAB_ACCOUNT
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 05:12:39PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:19:26 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> > >From 8b28d91475d54c552e503e66f169e1e00475c856 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:43:48 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: memcg/slab: pre-allocate obj_cgroups for slab
> > caches with SLAB_ACCOUNT
> >
> > In general it's unknown in advance if a slab page will contain
> > accounted objects or not. In order to avoid memory waste, an
> > obj_cgroup vector is allocated dynamically when a need to account
> > of a new object arises. Such approach is memory efficient, but
> > requires an expensive cmpxchg() to set up the memcg/objcgs pointer,
> > because an allocation can race with a different allocation on another
> > cpu.
> >
> > But in some common cases it's known for sure that a slab page will
> > contain accounted objects: if the page belongs to a slab cache with a
> > SLAB_ACCOUNT flag set. It includes such popular objects like
> > vm_area_struct, anon_vma, task_struct, etc.
> >
> > In such cases we can pre-allocate the objcgs vector and simple assign
> > it to the page without any atomic operations, because at this early
> > stage the page is not visible to anyone else.
> >
> > v2: inline set_page_objcgs() and add some comments, by Johannes
>
> Had me confused! I was looking for the inlined function
> set_page_objcgs(). I think "open-code" is a better term here than
> "inline".
Sorry for the confusion! And thanks for picking up the new version!
Roman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists