[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201113155825.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:58:25 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
kernelci-results@...ups.io,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: rmk/for-next bisection: baseline.login on bcm2836-rpi-2-b
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:43:27PM +0000, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> On 13/11/2020 10:35, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 11:31, Guillaume Tucker
> > <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ard,
> >>
> >> Please see the bisection report below about a boot failure on
> >> RPi-2b.
> >>
> >> Reports aren't automatically sent to the public while we're
> >> trialing new bisection features on kernelci.org but this one
> >> looks valid.
> >>
> >> There's nothing in the serial console log, probably because it's
> >> crashing too early during boot. I'm not sure if other platforms
> >> on kernelci.org were hit by this in the same way, but there
> >> doesn't seem to be any.
> >>
> >> The same regression can be see on rmk's for-next branch as well
> >> as in linux-next. It happens with both bcm2835_defconfig and
> >> multi_v7_defconfig.
> >>
> >> Some more details can be found here:
> >>
> >> https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/5fae44823818ee918adb8864/
> >>
> >> If this looks like a real issue but you don't have a platform at
> >> hand to reproduce it, please let us know if you would like the
> >> KernelCI test to be re-run with earlyprintk or some debug config
> >> turned on, or if you have a fix to try.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >> Guillaume
> >>
> >
> > Hello Guillaume,
> >
> > That patch did have an issue, but it was already fixed by
> >
> > https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=9020/1
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=fc2933c133744305236793025b00c2f7d258b687
> >
> > Could you please double check whether cherry-picking that on top of
> > the first bad commit fixes the problem?
>
> Sadly this doesn't appear to be fixing the issue. I've
> cherry-picked your patch on top of the commit found by the
> bisection but it still didn't boot, here's the git log
>
> cbb9656e83ca ARM: 9020/1: mm: use correct section size macro to describe the FDT virtual address
> 7a1be318f579 ARM: 9012/1: move device tree mapping out of linear region
> e9a2f8b599d0 ARM: 9011/1: centralize phys-to-virt conversion of DT/ATAGS address
> 3650b228f83a Linux 5.10-rc1
>
> Test log: https://people.collabora.com/~gtucker/lava/boot/rpi-2-b/v5.10-rc1-3-gcbb9656e83ca/
>
> There's no output so it's hard to tell what is going on, but
> reverting the bad commmit does make the board to boot (that's
> what "revert: PASS" means in the bisect report). So it's
> unlikely that there is another issue causing the boot failure.
These silent boot failures are precisely what the DEBUG_LL stuff (and
early_printk) is supposed to help with - getting the kernel messages
out when there is an oops before the serial console is initialised.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists