[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201113160158.idndhuygfgenxyhm@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:01:58 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Linux on Hyper-V List <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/17] x86/hyperv: handle IO-APIC when running as root
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 05:56:41PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
[...]
> > +static unsigned int hv_ioapic_startup_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + u16 status;
> > + struct IO_APIC_route_entry ire;
> > + u32 vector;
> > + struct irq_cfg *cfg;
> > + int ioapic;
> > + u8 ioapic_pin;
> > + int ioapic_id;
> > + int gsi;
> > + union entry_union eu;
> > + struct cpumask *affinity;
> > + int cpu, vcpu;
> > + struct hv_interrupt_entry entry;
> > + struct mp_chip_data *mp_data = data->chip_data;
> > +
> > + gsi = data->irq;
> > + cfg = irqd_cfg(data);
> > + affinity = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data);
> > + cpu = cpumask_first_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask);
> > + vcpu = hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpu);
> > +
> > + vector = cfg->vector;
> > +
> > + ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(gsi);
> > + ioapic_pin = mp_find_ioapic_pin(ioapic, gsi);
> > + ioapic_id = mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic);
> > + ire = ioapic_read_entry(ioapic, ioapic_pin);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Always try unmapping. We do not have visibility into which whether
> > + * an IO-APIC has been mapped or not. We can't use chip_data because it
> > + * already points to mp_data.
> > + *
> > + * We don't use retarget interrupt hypercalls here because Hyper-V
> > + * doens't allow root to change the vector or specify VPs outside of
> > + * the set that is initially used during mapping.
> > + */
> > + status = hv_unmap_ioapic_interrupt(gsi);
> > +
> > + if (!(status == HV_STATUS_SUCCESS || status == HV_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER)) {
> > + pr_debug("%s: unexpected unmap status %d\n", __func__, status);
> > + return -1;
>
> Nit: the function returns 'unsigned int' but I see other 'irq_startup'
> routines return negative values too, however, they tend to returd
> '-ESOMETHING' so maybe -EFAULT here?
>
The return type should've been int instead. That's what the function
signature in struct irq_chip looks like.
> > + }
> > +
> > + status = hv_map_ioapic_interrupt(ioapic_id, ire.trigger, vcpu, vector, &entry);
> > +
> > + if (status != HV_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> > + pr_err("%s: map hypercall failed, status %d\n", __func__, status);
> > + return -1;
>
> and here.
>
-EINVAL would be more appropriate in both cases.
Wei.
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Update the entry in mp_chip_data. It is used in other places. */
> > + mp_data->entry = *(struct IO_APIC_route_entry *)&entry.ioapic_rte;
> > +
> > + /* Sync polarity -- Hyper-V's returned polarity is always 0... */
> > + mp_data->entry.polarity = ire.polarity;
> > +
> > + eu.w1 = entry.ioapic_rte.low_uint32;
> > + eu.w2 = entry.ioapic_rte.high_uint32;
> > + ioapic_write_entry(ioapic, ioapic_pin, eu.entry);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void hv_ioapic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + mask_ioapic_irq(data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void hv_ioapic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + unmask_ioapic_irq(data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int hv_ioapic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> > + const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * We only update the affinity mask here. Programming the hardware is
> > + * done in irq_startup.
> > + */
> > + return ioapic_set_affinity(data, mask, force);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void hv_ioapic_ack_level(struct irq_data *irq_data)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Per email exchange with Hyper-V team, all is needed is write to
> > + * LAPIC's EOI register. They don't support directed EOI to IO-APIC.
> > + * Hyper-V handles it for us.
> > + */
> > + apic_ack_irq(irq_data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct irq_chip hv_ioapic_chip __read_mostly = {
> > + .name = "HV-IO-APIC",
> > + .irq_startup = hv_ioapic_startup_irq,
> > + .irq_mask = hv_ioapic_mask_irq,
> > + .irq_unmask = hv_ioapic_unmask_irq,
> > + .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent,
> > + .irq_eoi = hv_ioapic_ack_level,
> > + .irq_set_affinity = hv_ioapic_set_affinity,
> > + .irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
> > + .irq_get_irqchip_state = ioapic_irq_get_chip_state,
> > + .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +
> > +int (*native_acpi_register_gsi)(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity);
> > +void (*native_acpi_unregister_gsi)(u32 gsi);
> > +
> > +int hv_acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
> > +{
> > + int irq = gsi;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> > + irq = native_acpi_register_gsi(dev, gsi, trigger, polarity);
> > + if (irq < 0) {
> > + pr_err("native_acpi_register_gsi failed %d\n", irq);
> > + return irq;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (trigger) {
> > + irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_LEVEL);
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &hv_ioapic_chip,
> > + handle_fasteoi_irq, "ioapic-fasteoi");
> > + } else {
> > + irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_LEVEL);
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &hv_ioapic_chip,
> > + handle_edge_irq, "ioapic-edge");
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > + return irq;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void hv_acpi_unregister_gsi(u32 gsi)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> > + (void)hv_unmap_ioapic_interrupt(gsi);
> > + native_acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
> > +#endif
> > +}
>
> --
> Vitaly
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists