[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201113171923.29721-3-james.clark@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:19:12 +0200
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jolsa@...hat.com
Cc: james.clark@....com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/13 v3] perf tools: Use allocator for perf_cpu_map
Use the existing allocator for perf_cpu_map to avoid use
of raw malloc. This could cause an issue in later commits
where the size of perf_cpu_map is changed.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
---
tools/perf/util/cpumap.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
index dc5c5e6fc502..fd7d0a77a9e6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
@@ -132,15 +132,16 @@ int cpu_map__build_map(struct perf_cpu_map *cpus, struct perf_cpu_map **res,
int (*f)(struct perf_cpu_map *map, int cpu, void *data),
void *data)
{
- struct perf_cpu_map *c;
int nr = cpus->nr;
+ struct perf_cpu_map *c = perf_cpu_map__empty_new(nr);
int cpu, s1, s2;
- /* allocate as much as possible */
- c = calloc(1, sizeof(*c) + nr * sizeof(int));
if (!c)
return -1;
+ /* Reset size as it may only be partially filled */
+ c->nr = 0;
+
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr; cpu++) {
s1 = f(cpus, cpu, data);
for (s2 = 0; s2 < c->nr; s2++) {
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists