linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] fs: Avoid to use lockdep information if it's turned off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201113171927.GG6756@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:19:28 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fs: Avoid to use lockdep information if it's turned off

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:22:12AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> For the "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!" warning, do you see
> that every time when you run xfstests and don't see other lockdep
> splats? If so, that means we reach the limitation of number of lockdep
> hlock chains, and we should fix that.

It's not every time and depends on the release, eg. I found no reports
in a sample log for 5.7..5.9, while there are many for 5.2..5.6 and
5.10, every 2nd or 3rd run.

[    0.185150] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES:  8
[    0.186202] ... MAX_LOCK_DEPTH:          48
[    0.187286] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS:        8192
[    0.188404] ... CLASSHASH_SIZE:          4096
[    0.189519] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES:     32768
[    0.190672] ... MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS:      65536
[    0.191814] ... CHAINHASH_SIZE:          32768