[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201114010020.381277c2.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 01:00:20 +0100
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/14] s390/zcrypt: driver callback to indicate
resource in use
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:30:31 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> We will be using the mutex_trylock() function in our sysfs
> assignment
> interfaces which make the call to the AP bus to check permissions (which
> also
> locks ap_perms). If the mutex_trylock() fails, we return from the assignment
> function with -EBUSY. This should resolve that potential deadlock issue.
It resolves the deadlock issue only if in_use() is also doing
mutex_trylock(), but the if in_use doesn't take the lock it
needs to back off (and so does it's client code) i.e. a boolean as
return value won't do.
Regards,
Halil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists