linux-kernel - [PATCH] rtw88: coex: remove the unreached code in rtw_coex_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1605367343-11770-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Nov 2020 23:22:23 +0800
From:   xiakaixu1987@...il.com
To:     yhchuang@...ltek.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rtw88: coex: remove the unreached code in rtw_coex_set_tdma

From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>

The value of the bool variable ap_enable is always false, so the first
if branch is unreached code. Remove it.

Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c | 12 +-----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
index aa08fd7d9fcd..9c7963e45755 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
@@ -863,18 +863,8 @@ static void rtw_coex_set_tdma(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 byte1, u8 byte2,
 	struct rtw_coex_dm *coex_dm = &coex->dm;
 	struct rtw_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
 	u8 ps_type = COEX_PS_WIFI_NATIVE;
-	bool ap_enable = false;
-
-	if (ap_enable && (byte1 & BIT(4) && !(byte1 & BIT(5)))) {
-		byte1 &= ~BIT(4);
-		byte1 |= BIT(5);
-
-		byte5 |= BIT(5);
-		byte5 &= ~BIT(6);
 
-		ps_type = COEX_PS_WIFI_NATIVE;
-		rtw_coex_power_save_state(rtwdev, ps_type, 0x0, 0x0);
-	} else if (byte1 & BIT(4) && !(byte1 & BIT(5))) {
+	if (byte1 & BIT(4) && !(byte1 & BIT(5))) {
 		if (chip->pstdma_type == COEX_PSTDMA_FORCE_LPSOFF)
 			ps_type = COEX_PS_LPS_OFF;
 		else
-- 
2.20.0