linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] device: provide devm_krealloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X7ADFLwEpUHkTiT+@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Nov 2020 17:17:24 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] device: provide devm_krealloc_array()

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:46:41PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon,  2 Nov 2020 15:22:25 +0100
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> 
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > 
> > When allocating an array of elements, users should check for
> > multiplication overflow or preferably use one of the provided helpers
> > like: devm_kmalloc_array().
> > 
> > This provides devm_krealloc_array() for users who want to reallocate
> > managed arrays.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> 
> +CC Greg KH. 
> 
> As this is going into a very generic place I'd like a relevant ack.
> That file is a bit of a wild west for acks, but Greg seems most
> appropriate person.
> 
> So Greg, any comments on this one?

As there is only 1 user of this function in the patch series, you don't
save any extra code space here, I don't think this is worth it.

We are seeing less and less gains from these new devm_* additions, and
only more confusion and problems with them.  So perhaps don't add this?
I don't think it is needed.

thanks,

greg k-h