[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201114162159.GB24411@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 17:21:59 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
Cc: freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, hch@....de,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] drm/msm: call dma_direct_bypass()
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:17:11AM -0500, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> Always use direct dma ops and no swiotlb.
>
> Note: arm-smmu-qcom already avoids creating iommu dma ops, but not
> everything uses arm-smmu-qcom and this also sets the dma mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> index e5816b498494..07c50405970a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ config DRM_MSM
> select SND_SOC_HDMI_CODEC if SND_SOC
> select SYNC_FILE
> select PM_OPP
> + select DMA_OPS_BYPASS
> help
> DRM/KMS driver for MSM/snapdragon.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 49685571dc0e..bae48afca82e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h>
> @@ -1288,10 +1289,11 @@ static int msm_pdev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto fail;
>
> - /* on all devices that I am aware of, iommu's which can map
> - * any address the cpu can see are used:
> + /* always use direct dma ops and no swiotlb
Again, and implementation detail. Comments should not explain details
obvious from the code (especially layers away) but the intent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists