[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201114192202.GC5272@piout.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 20:22:02 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: use devm_input_allocate_device
On 14/11/2020 17:13:40+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:26:48 +0100
> Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Use devm_input_allocate_device to allocate the input device to simplify the
> > error and remove paths.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
>
> This one I'm less keen on. Whilst it's obviously not a problem in
> this particular case I'd ideally like to keep the remove order
> as the exact reverse of probe - that makes it easy to review changes
> quickly.
>
> Now, you could easily enough make this fine by using devm for the
> other items that happen before this (dev_add_action_or_reset needed
> in a few cases).
>
Right, I'll drop it for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists