linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 14 Nov 2020 11:17:38 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 9:38 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 14/11/20 5:44 am, Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > Arpitha: Do you want to send v7, but with the following modifications
> > from what I proposed? Assuming nobody objects.
> >
> > 1. Remove the num_params counter and don't print the number of params
> > anymore, nor do validation that generators are deterministic.
> > 2. Remove the [].
> > [ I'm happy to send as well, just let me know what you prefer. ]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -- Marco
> >
>
> If no objections I will send the v7 with the above changes.
> Thanks!

This sounds good to me!

Cheers,
-- David