linux-kernel - [PATCH] dmaengine: pl330: _prep_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1605326106-55681-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Nov 2020 11:55:06 +0800
From:   Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
To:     vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: pl330: _prep_dma_memcpy: Fix wrong burst size

Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'.
we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size.

dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126
@ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA:

dmatest:

/# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel
/# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size
/# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations
/# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom
/# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose
/# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run

dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000

Before:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0)

After this patch:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0)

After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0)

Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
---

 drivers/dma/pl330.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
index e9f0101..0f5c193 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
@@ -2799,7 +2799,7 @@ pl330_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst,
 	 * If burst size is smaller than bus width then make sure we only
 	 * transfer one at a time to avoid a burst stradling an MFIFO entry.
 	 */
-	if (desc->rqcfg.brst_size * 8 < pl330->pcfg.data_bus_width)
+	if (burst * 8 < pl330->pcfg.data_bus_width)
 		desc->rqcfg.brst_len = 1;
 
 	desc->bytes_requested = len;
-- 
2.7.4