[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kV-hcmf17_rzywuKXe5U0kwCOb52SihwZHUK0z0AsECA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 13:04:38 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Fix dwarf unwind for optimized builds.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 9:14 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately no GCC version actually has this fixed.
Then we can say GCC <= 11 does not support it yet or something like that.
> This seems overly complex and unnecessary.
How is 1 condition more complex than 3 different ones?
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists