linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v41 20/24] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e58ee564-597a-336e-53dc-7c4d172d51f5@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:19:12 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        asapek@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de, cedric.xing@...el.com,
        chenalexchen@...gle.com, conradparker@...gle.com,
        cyhanish@...gle.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com, kmoy@...gle.com,
        ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org, nhorman@...hat.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        yaozhangx@...gle.com, mikko.ylinen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v41 20/24] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX

On 11/12/20 3:01 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Add a selftest for SGX. It is a trivial test where a simple enclave copies
> one 64-bit word of memory between two memory locations, but ensures that
> all SGX hardware and software infrastructure is functioning.
> 
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com> # v40
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes from v40:
> * Remove $(OUTPUT)/test_encl.elf from TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS, as otherwise
>    run_tests tries to execute it. Add it as a build dependency.
> * Use the correct device path, /dev/sgx_enclave, instead of
>    /dev/sgx/enclave.
> * Return kselftest framework expected return codes.
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/Makefile              |   1 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/.gitignore        |   2 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/Makefile          |  53 +++
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/call.S            |  44 ++
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/defines.h         |  21 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c            | 277 +++++++++++++
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c            | 246 +++++++++++
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.h            |  38 ++
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/sigstruct.c       | 391 ++++++++++++++++++
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c       |  20 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds     |  40 ++
>   .../selftests/sgx/test_encl_bootstrap.S       |  89 ++++
>   12 files changed, 1222 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/.gitignore
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/Makefile
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/call.S
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/defines.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/sigstruct.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl_bootstrap.S
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> index d9c283503159..aa06e3ea0250 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ TARGETS += user
>   TARGETS += vm
>   TARGETS += x86
>   TARGETS += zram
> +TARGETS += sgx
>   #Please keep the TARGETS list alphabetically sorted

Please keep the list sorted alphabetically as stated
in the comment above.


> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[])
> +{
> +	struct sgx_enclave_run run;
> +	struct vdso_symtab symtab;
> +	Elf64_Sym *eenter_sym;
> +	uint64_t result = 0;
> +	struct encl encl;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	void *addr;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	memset(&run, 0, sizeof(run));
> +
> +	if (!encl_load("test_encl.elf", &encl)) {
> +		encl_delete(&encl);
> +		ksft_exit_skip("cannot load enclaves\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!encl_measure(&encl))
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	if (!encl_build(&encl))
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * An enclave consumer only must do this.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < encl.nr_segments; i++) {
> +		struct encl_segment *seg = &encl.segment_tbl[i];
> +
> +		addr = mmap((void *)encl.encl_base + seg->offset, seg->size,
> +			    seg->prot, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, encl.fd, 0);
> +		if (addr == MAP_FAILED) {
> +			fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed, errno=%d.\n", errno);
> +			exit(1);

This should be KSFT_FAIL.

thanks,
-- Shuah