[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3cf22df6-86fd-91b3-6dde-ce28ca48a6f6@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:34:50 +0100
From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
jan.setjeeilers@...cle.com, Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
oweisse@...gle.com, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.de>, mgross@...ux.intel.com,
kuzuno@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pti: Use a different stack canary with
the user and kernel page-table
On 11/16/20 5:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:48 AM Alexandre Chartre
> <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Using stack protector requires the stack canary to be mapped into
>> the current page-table. Now that the page-table switch between the
>> user and kernel page-table is deferred to C code, stack protector can
>> be used while the user page-table is active and so the stack canary
>> is mapped into the user page-table.
>>
>> To prevent leaking the stack canary used with the kernel page-table,
>> use a different canary with the user and kernel page-table. The stack
>> canary is changed when switching the page-table.
>
> Unless I've missed something, this doesn't have the security
> properties we want. One CPU can be executing with kernel CR3, and
> another CPU can read the stack canary using Meltdown.
I think you are right because we have the mapping to the stack canary in
the user page-table. From userspace, we will only read the user stack canary,
but using Meltdown we can speculatively read the kernel stack canary which
will be stored at the same place.
> I think that doing this safely requires mapping a different page with
> the stack canary in the two pagetables.
Right.
alex.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists