linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: allwinner: dts: a64: add DT for PineTab developer sample

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8FFC1A6C-9CA4-4F94-91C4-F111A7519979@aosc.io>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 02:36:48 +0800
From:   Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
To:     maxime@...no.tech, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: allwinner: dts: a64: add DT for PineTab developer sample



于 2020年11月16日 GMT+08:00 下午11:55:08, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> 写到:
>On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:41:37PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 于 2020年11月10日 GMT+08:00 下午6:39:25, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
>写到:
>> >On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 08:53:32PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> Some developers received PineTab samples that used an old LCD
>panel.
>> >> 
>> >> Add device tree for these samples.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile        |  1 +
>> >>  .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinetab-dev.dts  | 28
>> >+++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>> >>  create mode 100644
>> >arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinetab-dev.dts
>> >> 
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
>> >b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
>> >> index 211d1e9d4701..a221dcebfad4 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
>> >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) +=
>> >sun50i-a64-pinephone-1.0.dtb
>> >>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-a64-pinephone-1.1.dtb
>> >>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-a64-pinephone-1.2.dtb
>> >>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-a64-pinetab.dtb
>> >> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-a64-pinetab-dev.dtb
>> >>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-a64-sopine-baseboard.dtb
>> >>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-a64-teres-i.dtb
>> >>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-a100-allwinner-perf1.dtb
>> >> diff --git
>a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinetab-dev.dts
>> >b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinetab-dev.dts
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 000000000000..3a4153890f3e
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinetab-dev.dts
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
>> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
>> >> + *
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> +/dts-v1/;
>> >> +
>> >> +#include "sun50i-a64-pinetab.dts"
>> >> +
>> >> +/ {
>> >> +	model = "PineTab Developer Sample";
>> >> +	compatible = "pine64,pinetab-dev", "allwinner,sun50i-a64";
>> >> +};
>> >
>> >Changing the DT and the compatible half-way through it isn't ok.
>Please
>> >add a new DT with the newer revision like we did for the pinephone
>> 
>> We did this on Pine H64.
>
>What are you referring to? I couldn't find a commit where we did what
>you suggested in that patch to the pine H64.

Oh the situation is complex. On Pine H64, we didn't specify anything at
start (which is the same here), the DT is originally version-neutral
but then transitioned to model B, then reverted to model A. Here the DT is always
for the sample.

However, for Pine H64 there's model A/B names, but for PineTab there's no
any samples that are sold, thus except who got the samples, all PineTab
owners simply owns a "PineTab", not a "PineTab xxx version".

>
>Maxime