linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS: kernel: Fix for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:49:05 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: kernel: Fix for_each_memblock conversion

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> The loop over all memblocks works with PFN numbers and not physical
> addresses, so we need for_each_mem_pfn_range().
> 
> Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>

Thanks, Thomas!

> ---
>  arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> index 0d4253208bde..ca579deef939 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -262,8 +262,8 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  static void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t ramstart, ramend;
> -	phys_addr_t start, end;
> -	u64 i;
> +	unsigned long start, end;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	ramstart = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
>  	ramend = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  
>  	min_low_pfn = ARCH_PFN_OFFSET;
>  	max_pfn = PFN_DOWN(ramend);
> -	for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
> +	for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Skip highmem here so we get an accurate max_low_pfn if low
>  		 * memory stops short of high memory.
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.