[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLXhpE-vw_jL-0_fc1eg-aU5_sLwoNAUiPdUUHx2ubxrkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:40:55 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] firmware: QCOM_SCM: Allow qcom_scm driver to be
loadable as a permenent module
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 7:59 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 04:27:10AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > index 04878caf6da49..c64d7a2b65134 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ config SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
> > config ARM_SMMU
> > tristate "ARM Ltd. System MMU (SMMU) Support"
> > depends on ARM64 || ARM || (COMPILE_TEST && !GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
> > + depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM #if QCOM_SCM=m this can't be =y
> > select IOMMU_API
> > select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
> > select ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU if ARM
>
> This, in conjunction with deferred probe timeout, causes mayhem on
> Tegra186. The problem, as far as I can tell, is that there are various
> devices that are hooked up to the ARM SMMU, but if ARM SMMU ends up
> being built as a loadable module, then those devices will initialize
> without IOMMU support (because deferred probe will timeout before the
> ARM SMMU module can be loaded from the root filesystem).
>
> Unfortunately, the ARM SMMU module will eventually end up being loaded
> once the root filesystem has been mounted (for example via SDHCI or
> Ethernet, both with using just plain, non-IOMMU-backed DMA API) and then
> initialize, configuring as "fault by default", which then results from a
> slew of SMMU faults from all the devices that have previously configured
> themselves without IOMMU support.
Oof. My apologies for the trouble. Thanks so much for the report.
Out of curiosity, does booting with deferred_probe_timeout=30 avoid
the issue for you?
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists