linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:29 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:25:52 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:24:32 -0700
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> 
> > The problem is those literal blocks.  The easiest fix will be to just use
> > the double-colon notation to indicate a literal block, so the paragraph
> > above would end with "...start your code with::".  Note that there's a few
> > of them to fix.  
> 
> Would something like the below work? I think I fixed the other places with
> issues and for consistency, replaced the ".. code-block:: c" with just "::"
> usage throughout the file.

That will work.  It will also have the effect of removing C syntax
highlighting from the formatted output; that is fine with me, but others
are more attached to it.

jon