[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201116204746.GC2672@gate.crashing.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:47:46 -0600
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
Cc: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...eaurora.org>,
Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Error: invalid switch -me200
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:27:12PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 18:50 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> > doesn't exist (in mainline binutils). Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
> > instead.
>
> According to Wikipedia e200 is from mpc55xx (for which I don't see any
> platform support having ever been added). e5500 is completely different (64-
> bit version of e500mc).
Ah yes, confusing processor numbers :-( That explains, sorry.
Segher
Powered by blists - more mailing lists