[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW+Jek_t51RyqxO=HUA_PJ4APwS9hJQWsXyc426cgf0wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:04:02 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Mark Mossberg <mark.mossberg@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
kyin@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/dumpstack: Fix misleading instruction pointer
error message
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:01 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static int copy_code(struct pt_regs *reg
> if (!user_mode(regs))
> return copy_from_kernel_nofault(buf, (u8 *)src, nbytes);
>
> + /* The user space code from other tasks cannot be accessed. */
> + if (regs != task_pt_regs(current))
> + return -EPERM;
Depending on exactly where this gets called, this may not be
sufficient. You should also check nmi_uaccess_okay().
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists