lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:30:27 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: enable
 broadcast/multicast rate limit support

> Same as above, just in packets per second.
> 
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 clsact
> tc filter add dev eth0 ingress flower skip_sw \
> 	dst_mac 01:00:00:00:00:00/01:00:00:00:00:00 \
> 	action police rate 20kpps

I agree with Vladimir here. Since the hardware does PPS limits, the TC
API should also be PPS limit based. And as you said, CPU load is more
a factor of PPS than BPS, so it is a useful feature in general to
have. You just need to implement the software version first, before
you offload it to the hardware.

    Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists