[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201116104316.31816-11-eric.auger@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:43:11 +0100
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: eric.auger.pro@...il.com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, will@...nel.org,
joro@...tes.org, maz@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com
Cc: jean-philippe@...aro.org, zhangfei.gao@...aro.org,
zhangfei.gao@...il.com, vivek.gautam@....com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com, tn@...ihalf.com,
nicoleotsuka@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v12 10/15] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement
In nested mode we enforce the rule that all devices belonging
to the same iommu_domain share the same msi_domain.
Indeed if there were several physical MSI doorbells being used
within a single iommu_domain, it becomes really difficult to
resolve the nested stage mapping translating into the correct
physical doorbell. So let's forbid this situation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 4b796693d697..de03ac111f76 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2265,6 +2265,37 @@ static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master);
}
+static bool arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+ struct irq_domain *irqd = dev_get_msi_domain(dev);
+ struct arm_smmu_master *master;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool share = false;
+
+ if (!irqd)
+ return true;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) {
+ struct irq_domain *d = dev_get_msi_domain(master->dev);
+
+ if (!d)
+ continue;
+ if (irqd != d) {
+ dev_info(dev, "Nested mode forbids to attach devices "
+ "using different physical MSI doorbells "
+ "to the same iommu_domain");
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ }
+ share = true;
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
+ return share;
+}
+
static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -2316,6 +2347,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
+ /*
+ * In nested mode we must check all devices belonging to the
+ * domain share the same physical MSI doorbell. Otherwise nested
+ * stage MSI binding is not supported.
+ */
+ if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED &&
+ !arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(domain, dev)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
master->domain = smmu_domain;
--
2.21.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists