[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=nTM9enY2pTm8aoR8grPiiODCif5d7DDnOLkivaY2fsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:33:00 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: fix -Wimplicit-fallthrough
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:35 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> The "fallthrough" pseudo-keyword was added as a portable way to denote
> intentional fallthrough. Clang will still warn on cases where there is a
> fallthrough to an immediate break. Add explicit breaks for those cases.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/236
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
It makes things clearer having a `break` added, so I like that warning.
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists