[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201116144914.GE3121378@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:49:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, corbet@....net,
keescook@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:03:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think almost all of this information should go into atomic_ops.rst
No, we should delete atomic_ops.rst. It's bitrotted nonsense. The only
reason it still exists is because I can't seem to get around to
verifying we've actually covered everything in the new documentation:
Documentation/atomic_*.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists