linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 04/21] mm/hugetlb: Introduce nr_free_vmemmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtU1v+6zje_-CqrvHLSbDYkcLeVpi=29-AMieOXQE5Qokg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:40:10 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 04/21] mm/hugetlb: Introduce
 nr_free_vmemmap_pages in the struct hstate

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:33 PM Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 06:59:35PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > If the size of HugeTLB page is 2MB, we need 512 struct page structures
> > (8 pages) to be associated with it. As far as I know, we only use the
> > first 4 struct page structures. Use of first 4 struct page structures
> > comes from HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER.
>
> Once you mention 2MB HugeTLB page and its specific I would also mention
> 1GB HugeTLB pages, maybe something along these lines.
> I would supress "As far as I know", we __know__ that we only use
> the first 4 struct page structures to track metadata information.

Thanks. Will do.

>
> > +/*
> > + * There are 512 struct page structures(8 pages) associated with each 2MB
> > + * hugetlb page. For tail pages, the value of compound_head is the same.
> > + * So we can reuse first page of tail page structures. We map the virtual
> > + * addresses of the remaining 6 pages of tail page structures to the first
> > + * tail page struct, and then free these 6 pages. Therefore, we need to
> > + * reserve at least 2 pages as vmemmap areas.
> > + */
> > +#define RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR           2U
>
> Either I would include 1GB specific there as well, or I would not add
> any specifics at all and just go by saying that first two pages are used,
> and the rest can be remapped to the first page that contains the tails.

Thanks. Will do.

>
>
> > +void __init hugetlb_vmemmap_init(struct hstate *h)
> > +{
> > +     unsigned int order = huge_page_order(h);
> > +     unsigned int vmemmap_pages;
> > +
> > +     vmemmap_pages = ((1 << order) * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +     /*
> > +      * The head page and the first tail page are not to be freed to buddy
> > +      * system, the others page will map to the first tail page. So there
> "the remaining pages" might be more clear.

Thanks.

>
> > +      * are (@vmemmap_pages - RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR) pages can be freed.
> "that can be freed"

Thanks.

>
> > +      *
> > +      * Could RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR be greater than @vmemmap_pages? This is
> > +      * not expected to happen unless the system is corrupted. So on the
> > +      * safe side, it is only a safety net.
> > +      */
> > +     if (likely(vmemmap_pages > RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR))
> > +             h->nr_free_vmemmap_pages = vmemmap_pages - RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR;
> > +     else
> > +             h->nr_free_vmemmap_pages = 0;
>
> This made think of something.
> Since struct hstate hstates is global, all the fields should be defined to 0.
> So, the following assignments in hugetlb_add_hstate:
>
>         h->nr_huge_pages = 0;
>         h->free_huge_pages = 0;
>
> should not be needed.
> Actually, we do not initialize other values like resv_huge_pages
> or surplus_huge_pages.
>
> If that is the case, the "else" could go.

Yeah, I agree with you.

>
> Mike?
>
> The changes itself look good to me.
> I think that putting all the vemmap stuff into hugetlb-vmemmap.* was
> the right choice.
>
>
> --
> Oscar Salvador
> SUSE L3



-- 
Yours,
Muchun