[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWwnK1AwrGRn8Kuin-23NOG31LrWBO7w=T2QE+EJW=f-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:17:29 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/pv: switch SWAPGS to ALTERNATIVE
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 7:23 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>
> SWAPGS is used only for interrupts coming from user mode or for
> returning to user mode. So there is no reason to use the PARAVIRT
> framework, as it can easily be replaced by an ALTERNATIVE depending
> on X86_FEATURE_XENPV.
>
> There are several instances using the PV-aware SWAPGS macro in paths
> which are never executed in a Xen PV guest. Replace those with the
> plain swapgs instruction. For SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK the same applies.
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists