linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: qcom: Add SDX55 GCC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:56:00 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        sboyd@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Naveen Yadav <naveenky@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: qcom: Add SDX55 GCC support

On 14-11-20, 19:17, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

> > > +enum {
> > > +	P_BI_TCXO,
> > > +	P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE,
> > 
> > This is for test and we removed this for upstream, so can you do that as
> > well (not parent will decrease for clks below)
> > 
> 
> We have several other platforms that includes the bi_pll_test clock -
> and it's there in the hardware, so I think we should just keep it.

I dont mind either way ;)

> Is it causing any issues?

Not that I am aware off.. It was request from Steve to remove these as
they will not be used upstream

-- 
~Vinod