linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] net: Have netpoll bring-up DSA management interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201117001213.3dk6fluycx5fi2h4@skbuf>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 02:12:13 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: Have netpoll bring-up DSA management interface

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:04:49PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:54:05 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Yeah, I think Florian just wants netconsole to work in stable kernels,
> > which is a fair point. As for my 16-line patch that I suggested to him
> > in the initial reply, what do you think, would that be a "stable"
> > candidate? We would be introducing a fairly user-visible change
> > (removing one step that is mentioned as necessary in the documentation),
> > do you think it would benefit the users more to also have that behavior
> > change backported to all LTS kernels, or just keep it as something new
> > for v5.11?
>
> Yeah, I'd think that's too risky for a backport.

Ok, I retract my charges then. Florian, depending on how quickly you
have time to resend, I might be able to double-test your patch tonight
before I go to sleep.