linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.9 029/255] powerpc/eeh_cache: Fix a possible debugfs deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201117122140.362795722@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:02:49 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>,
        Oliver OHalloran <oohall@...il.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 029/255] powerpc/eeh_cache: Fix a possible debugfs deadlock

From: Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit fd552e0542b4532483289cce48fdbd27b692984b ]

Lockdep complains that a possible deadlock below in
eeh_addr_cache_show() because it is acquiring a lock with IRQ enabled,
but eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev() needs to acquire the same lock with IRQ
disabled. Let's just make eeh_addr_cache_show() acquire the lock with
IRQ disabled as well.

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock);
                                local_irq_disable();
                                lock(&tp->lock);
                                lock(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock);
   <Interrupt>
     lock(&tp->lock);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  lock_acquire+0x140/0x5f0
  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x64/0xb0
  eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev+0x48/0x390
  eeh_probe_device+0xb8/0x1a0
  pnv_pcibios_bus_add_device+0x3c/0x80
  pcibios_bus_add_device+0x118/0x290
  pci_bus_add_device+0x28/0xe0
  pci_bus_add_devices+0x54/0xb0
  pcibios_init+0xc4/0x124
  do_one_initcall+0xac/0x528
  kernel_init_freeable+0x35c/0x3fc
  kernel_init+0x24/0x148
  ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x80

  lock_acquire+0x140/0x5f0
  _raw_spin_lock+0x4c/0x70
  eeh_addr_cache_show+0x38/0x110
  seq_read+0x1a0/0x660
  vfs_read+0xc8/0x1f0
  ksys_read+0x74/0x130
  system_call_exception+0xf8/0x1d0
  system_call_common+0xe8/0x218

Fixes: 5ca85ae6318d ("powerpc/eeh_cache: Add a way to dump the EEH address cache")
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201028152717.8967-1-cai@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
index 6b50bf15d8c19..bf3270426d82d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
@@ -264,8 +264,9 @@ static int eeh_addr_cache_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
 {
 	struct pci_io_addr_range *piar;
 	struct rb_node *n;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock, flags);
 	for (n = rb_first(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.rb_root); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
 		piar = rb_entry(n, struct pci_io_addr_range, rb_node);
 
@@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ static int eeh_addr_cache_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
 		       (piar->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? "i/o" : "mem",
 		       &piar->addr_lo, &piar->addr_hi, pci_name(piar->pcidev));
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.27.0